Keep up to date on open scholarly communication! Check out what’s new on the blog.
Find a Resource
Browse Filtered Resources
A set of infographics emerging from our work on how preprints should be represented to broad audiences. These infographics summarize more detailed documents drafted by working groups who considered how preprint servers, researchers, institutions, and journalists could most accurately describe work in preprints.
Frequently asked questions about preprints, French translation
ASAPbio hosted online event on January 14th that brought together a wide range of expertise to highlight issues around the media reporting of research with a special focus on preprints.
We have seen a number of initiatives arise in recent years aiming to tackle concerns around the reproducibility of published findings. Researchers in the life sciences now have a number of tools at their disposal to boost the reproducibility of their science and preprints have emerged as an instrumental element within this toolkit. Preprints broaden the when, by whom and how of the review and feedback on research compared to the journal publication process, help address publication bias, and can play an important role as a vehicle towards open science practices. Preprints hold further untapped potential to close the gap between discovery and dissemination, and to accelerate the path to a more reproducible research ecosystem.
ASAPbio, with support from the Open Society Foundations, aimed to consolidate and expand on existing efforts to set best practice standards for reporting research posted as preprints via the launch of our Preprints in the Public Eye project.
In this November 2020 application for the Shuttleworth fellowship, ASAPbio Executive Director Jessica Polka argues that the true value of preprints won’t be realized until researchers use them to share their work well before it’s ready for a journal.