{"id":3439,"date":"2020-07-27T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2020-07-27T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/pl-asapbio.local\/biopreprints2020-survey-initial-results\/"},"modified":"2025-03-28T21:37:06","modified_gmt":"2025-03-28T21:37:06","slug":"biopreprints2020-survey-initial-results","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/biopreprints2020-survey-initial-results\/","title":{"rendered":"Preprint authors optimistic about benefits: preliminary results from the #bioPreprints2020 survey"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em>With contributions from Kathryn Funk, Alice Meadows, Alex Mendon\u00e7a, Oya Rieger, and Sowmya Swaminathan<\/em><\/p>\n<p>After our <a href=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/building-trust-in-preprints-together\">#bioPreprints2020<\/a> meeting, a working group of attendees set out to understand how to best increase awareness about preprints among varied groups of stakeholders (such as librarians, journalists, publishers, funders, research administrators, students, clinicians, and more). To accomplish this goal, we first designed a survey to explore the perspectives of each group and seek feedback on the perceived benefits and concerns around preprints.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>We put out an open call for participation in a web-based survey during the period June 16-July 16, 2020 \u2014 thanks to SciELO, SSRN, Wiley, Springer Nature, Cambridge University Press and others for spreading the word. A total of 546 people took the survey, but the results presented here have been filtered based on one of our predefined descriptions of their role (such as researcher in academia, funder, journalist, etc).<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re still processing the results, but wanted to share some preliminary observations.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Researchers came out in force<\/h3>\n<p>The majority of survey respondents (337) identified as researchers in academia, which is unsurprising given that this group tends to be directly involved in authoring and reading preprints. We were delighted to see a good representation of respondents from Latin America and the Caribean (178), thanks in large part to distribution of the survey by Scientific Electronic Library Online (<a href=\"https:\/\/www.scielo.br\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">SciELO<\/a>).<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1458\" height=\"716\" src=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2.png\" alt=\"Survey overview\" class=\"wp-image-4779\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2.png 1458w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2-300x147.png 300w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2-1024x503.png 1024w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2-768x377.png 768w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2.png 1300w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/surveyOverview-2.png 650w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1458px) 100vw, 1458px\"><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Top benefits and concerns about preprints<\/h3>\n<p>Topping the list of benefits of preprints: a close tie between increasing the speed of research communication and preprints being free to read. More than two thirds of respondents listed these as \u201cvery beneficial.\u201d Preprints being free to post, providing additional exposure for research, and the opportunity for feedback were also popular, with more than half of respondents indicating these attributes are \u201cvery beneficial.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Respondents were most concerned about premature media coverage of preprints, with almost 40% rating this as \u201cvery concerning.\u201d Publicly sharing information before peer review was also \u201cvery concerning\u201d to 30% of respondents. Uncertainty about copyright and licensing of preprints, information overload, and preprint authors scooping and being scooped were each viewed as \u201cvery concerning\u201d by 15-20% of respondents.<\/p>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Preprint authors see more benefits and fewer concerns<\/h3>\n<p>As you might expect, the perceived benefits and concerns surrounding preprints change when we slice the data by respondents who have posted a preprint and those who have not. Preprint authors are less likely to have concerns than those who have not published a preprint, although premature media coverage is the top concern for both groups.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ConcernsaboutPreprints-2.png\" alt=\"Concerns about preprints\" class=\"wp-image-4781\" width=\"719\" height=\"730\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ConcernsaboutPreprints-2.png 719w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/ConcernsaboutPreprints-2-295x300.png 295w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 719px) 100vw, 719px\"><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>Similarly, respondents who have posted a preprint generally viewed them as more beneficial, with ~25% jumps in the fraction of respondents citing speed increases, preprints being free to read and post, demonstrating productivity for grants and jobs, and additional exposure to research as \u201cvery beneficial.\u201d Interestingly, similar proportions of respondents in both groups saw the benefits of early feedback and enabling sharing of results that don\u2019t fit in journals.<\/p>\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\">\n<figure class=\"aligncenter size-full is-resized\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/benefitsofPreprints-2.png\" alt=\"Benefits of preprints\" class=\"wp-image-4782\" width=\"733\" height=\"728\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/benefitsofPreprints-2.png 733w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/benefitsofPreprints-2-300x298.png 300w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/benefitsofPreprints-2-150x150.png 150w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 733px) 100vw, 733px\"><\/figure>\n<\/div>\n<p>The profile of preprinting vs-non-preprinting respondents varies depending on career stage, geographic distribution, and other types of experience with preprints, as shown below.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<figure class=\"wp-block-image size-full\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"1589\" height=\"716\" src=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2.png\" alt=\"Comparing preprint authors vs non-authors\" class=\"wp-image-4780\" srcset=\"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2.png 1589w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2-300x135.png 300w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2-1024x461.png 1024w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2-768x346.png 768w, https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/03\/Preprintauthorsvsnon-2-1536x692.png 1536w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 1589px) 100vw, 1589px\"><\/figure>\n<h3 class=\"wp-block-heading\">More to explore<\/h3>\n<p>This is just one way of segmenting the data, but there are many more. We invite you to help us explore the <a href=\"https:\/\/docs.google.com\/spreadsheets\/d\/1-H_Pk01_M0RTbIYGTSXrMfd2pUWXs7RGhlelIxLoKJM\/edit#gid=770810781\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">interactive dashboard<\/a> we have created. If you find something interesting, please get in touch (jessica.polka@asapbio.org); we\u2019d love for you to write a guest blog post or share your findings elsewhere. As we continue to analyze the data (including a wealth of free-text responses), we look forward to sharing additional findings with you.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>With contributions from Kathryn Funk, Alice Meadows, Alex Mendon\u00e7a, Oya Rieger, and Sowmya Swaminathan After our #bioPreprints2020 meeting, a working group of attendees set out to understand how to best [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":2140,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[41,44],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3439","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-asapbio-news","category-preprints"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3439","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3439"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3439\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3440,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3439\/revisions\/3440"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/2140"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3439"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3439"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/asapbio.org\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3439"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}