Skip to navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to footer

Keep up to date on open scholarly communication! Check out what’s new on the blog.

New to preprints and open peer review? Explore our resource library.

Get the latest and greatest preprint and open peer review news in your inbox! Sign up for our newsletter.

Blog Category: Guest posts

PanLingua homepage with 'Patogenos resistentes' typed into search bar for Spanish language search

Search for preprints in your native language with PanLingua

Humberto Debat1 & Richard Abdill2 The majority of scholarly work in biology is published in English, a language most of the world does not speak. To help remediate this key issue hindering inclusive scientific dialogue, we built PanLingua, a multilingual preprint search tool intended to enable search and global access to machine translations of all preprints hosted by bioRxiv.org: users can en...
Read more
A man in an academic library

To preprint or not to preprint? Research for a more transparent publishing system

This blogpost is cross-posted from the ScholCommLab blog (Alice Feerackers, July 29 2019) and provides an update on a current research project by two visiting scholars supported by ASAPbio. “For researchers, there is immense pressure to publish in journals that are highly competitive,” says Naomi Penfold, associate director of the scientist-driven nonprofit ASAPbio.
Read more
A plot of overall reporting score for bioRxiv preprints versus PubMed articles

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles – first results are in!

By Olavo B. AmaralInstitute of Medical Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil A while ago, we blogged about our crowdsourced project to compare quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles.
Read more
A logo with the word ASAPbio appears over a background of clear lab test tubes. A red arrow points to the left before the word.

COS opens survey about indicators of credibility for preprints

The Center for Open Science is seeking graduate students, post docs, researchers and academic faculty to participate in survey to investigate the factors that affect the perceived credibility and use of preprints. Participation in this study involves: ● A time commitment of up to 20 minutes.
Read more
Abstract image featuring streaks of blue light radiating from the center against a dark background, creating a dynamic, energetic effect.

Advocating for publishing peer review

By Iain Cheeseman Whitehead Institute Journals play a critical role in the scientific process, refining research through peer review and disseminating it to appropriate communities. At its best, the publishing process is a partnership among editors, staff, authors, reviewers, and readers.
Read more
Scatter plot showing the average reporting quality of preprints versus peer-reviewed articles. Two columns of data points with error bars represent mean ± SD. One column is from bioRxiv and the other from PubMed, with percentages on the y-axis.

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles – a crowdsourced initiative

By Olavo B. Amaral Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil As the preprint movement gains traction in biology, the time is ripe to revisit some aspects of scientific publication that we view as fundamental – first and fo...
Read more
1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 .. 10