Skip to navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to footer

Keep up to date on open scholarly communication! Check out what’s new on the blog.

New to preprints and open peer review? Explore our resource library.

Get the latest and greatest preprint and open peer review news in your inbox! Sign up for our newsletter.

Blog Category: Peer review

Abstract image featuring streaks of blue light radiating from the center against a dark background, creating a dynamic, energetic effect.

Advocating for publishing peer review

By Iain Cheeseman Whitehead Institute Journals play a critical role in the scientific process, refining research through peer review and disseminating it to appropriate communities. At its best, the publishing process is a partnership among editors, staff, authors, reviewers, and readers.
Read more
Scatter plot showing the average reporting quality of preprints versus peer-reviewed articles. Two columns of data points with error bars represent mean ± SD. One column is from bioRxiv and the other from PubMed, with percentages on the y-axis.

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles – a crowdsourced initiative

By Olavo B. Amaral Institute of Medical Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil As the preprint movement gains traction in biology, the time is ripe to revisit some aspects of scientific publication that we view as fundamental – first and fo...
Read more
A logo with the word ASAPbio appears over a background of clear lab test tubes. A red arrow points to the left before the word.

How to launch a transformative and sustainable forum for publication and scholarly critiques of research in the life sciences?

By Harinder Singh Director, Division of Immunobiology and the Center for Systems Immunology Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center This perspective is a result of the various insightful commentaries that have been posted on the ASAPbio site ... It is clear from the various commentaries that our shared intent is to strengthen and accelerate research in the life sciences through transformation of the publication landscape.
Read more
A close-up of a fake disguise featuring a pair of round spectacles attached to a bushy, white beard and mustache. The background is dark, highlighting the whimsical appearance of the disguise.

Early Career Researchers and their involvement in peer review

By Gary McDowell, Future of Research When it comes to peer review and the role that Early Career Researchers (ECRs) play in it, I am of course reminded of the immortal words of Steve McKnight in his President’s Message at the American Society for B... Biomedical research is a huge enterprise now; it attracts riff-raff who never would have survived as scientists in the 1960s and 1970s.
Read more
A logo with the word ASAPbio appears over a background of clear lab test tubes. A red arrow points to the left before the word.

In support of journal-agnostic review

By Vivian Siegel In my own experience, and I’ve written about this in the past, peer review in the context of journal submission suffers from a number of biases. These include journal-based biases that would be eliminated by a journal agnostic process.
Read more
Flowchart illustrating prepublication quality control: Manuscript leads to preprint and quality control data curation. Followed by peer review, technical review, and copyediting, resulting in a final research paper. Human curation and automation are integrated.

Preprint QC

By Bernd Pulverer, EMBO As preprint posting takes hold in the biosciences community, we need both quality control and curation to ensure we share results in a reproducible and discoverable manner The EC has taken the bold step – at least on pa... The Open Science piece includes an ongoing project ‘The Open Science cloud’ as well as a dedicated online publishing/preprint platform – details pending at the time of writing.
Read more
1 .. 4 5 6 7 8 9